Monday, March 29, 2010

What Are Quadline Roller Skates

A program for autism? Not without the subject

believe that every moment, whatever, is a time to work not only for what it brings concrete rehabilitation, but also for the opening, the place made for the child and his speech will spell out or not in words, it is not always and in any case not only at the time of re-education workshops, when children address what is for them a problem.

Always be willing to hear what is said, to acknowledge receipt of the word of the child, whatever manner, place and time of emergence, is one of the cornerstones of our practice that makes every moment in the presence of the child is a moment of work.

If there's one thing we teach clinical practice is that a child is unlike any other. Each, depending on the point where he is but also of their centers of interest and the particular work you are doing, has a different way to go before learning and socialization.

From there, an individualized rehabilitation implies to us that we near as possible to places of interest specific to each child to bring to a learning process. While some methods are based on an apprenticeship and then set a standard material to children, l'Antenne work the other way. We left the child as it is, with their potential and their disabilities but also to its privileged object-this may be a stick, a rope, a circuit, etc .- and we invent tools, strategies to expand, move, generalize that center privileged interest and the child to gradually towards a learning process. Thus, attention and interest of the child were raised by the defendant work, which becomes self-motivating and source of satisfaction. "

(On the question of autonomy)

One of the important objectives of any rehabilitation is the acquisition of autonomy, ie ensure that a child not in need of support adult basic activities of daily living. (...)

Sometimes the child is perfectly capable of dressing, but adults demand that makes problems, whether it sets the child, which paralyzed, you activate your irony: the child then refuses to dress or any way makes a mockery of the adult. In this case, our experience has taught us to put up strategies: do not stay focused on this demand, addressed to all children in the room, looking away, talking about something else, singing, pop out of the room, etc. These maneuvers allow a range within which children can access adult demand without being annihilated by it, without having to defend themselves.

Much more fundamental, autonomy alone is not enough. Many autistic children are not only too "autonomous." Not only do not need anyone's help needs to be met, but mostly have no regard for anyone. Thus, a child may be perfectly capable of pouring water on his own. But our choice is not to help himself, but ask this water, ie passing through the adult and the symbolic gesture and language to express and satisfy their need. (...) Be independent, yes, but not others.

Antenne 110. Préliminaire 16.
schools and health clinics for children with developmental disorders and severe personality disorders, agreed by the INAMI (Belgium).
www.antenne110.be

Friday, March 26, 2010

How To Check O2 Sensor Yukon




is a truism that is taking shape between movements have accused psychoanalysis of the blame on parents of autistic children. It must be said that psychoanalysis was not who placed the etiology of autism in emotional problems between fathers and sons, but the established Austrian psychiatrist Leo Kanner in the United States, who is owed the first medical description of autism. On the other hand, it is ironic or perhaps rooted in a strong lack of what psychoanalysis is, the attribution "blame" someone. No other speech desculpabilizado modernity has been studied more and better place of the blame on the subjectivity psychoanalysis. It is not part of either the therapeutic or analytic experience blame the subject, but rather to accompany him on a journey through which we can place vital coordinates that have caused discomfort or distress and offer the subject a new opportunity. However, when dealing with the guilt we must not ignore that it is considering a profoundly complex and is crucial to have integrated some way the relationship with others. In the final analysis, a subject without guilt not perceive the limits of its dominion over others and, thus, can become cynical exercise his power to commit the worst atrocities. On the other hand, in our Judeo-Christian, guilt is the center of religious belief. Moreover, he has spent listening to the suffering of beings who speak, make sure someone knows that the cause of the problems your child is due to a biological error or may not relieve the guilt and anguish. The psychoanalyst does not blame either the family or the child, or the analysand. Allows the analyst who wants to meet their own fortunes vital to continue an ethical path to take you to the roots for the most part unconscious of guilt.
On the other hand, the origin of autism remains unknown. So says Simon Baron-Cohen, professor of psychiatry and psychology at Trinity College in Cambridge where he directs the Center for Autism. It also states: "still not know the exact hereditary factors involved and their mechanisms." Scientific investigations are far from conclusive. For example, Thomas Bourgeron, the Pasteur Institute in Paris, has identified genetic mutations in 6% of the cases studied, 6%! Genetic mutations that have input means nothing also would need to consider whether these mutations occur or not non-autistic people to be scientifically decisive. One of the difficulties in establishing the cause lies in the difficulty of diagnosis same, so we speak of "autism spectrum." No treatment, or any serious, humble and strict, as is true science, can act back to these impasses.
In any case, whatever the cause and the fate of a human body, it is inhabited by an individual who responds in a singular and unique to the vicissitudes of his body. This subject deals with psychoanalysis. Whether your "disorder" is not due to genetic mutations, disconnections neural or hormonal imbalances, also the subject must respond to all this. Psychoanalysis deals with the response that is ultimately what is properly human being. A once-and-answer marked, no doubt, critical contingencies for each. The cure for autistic child from Lacanian psychoanalysis guidance from here.
more than 30 years ago that Lacanian psychoanalysis is concerned with autism in European centers. An extensive bibliography has also deployed at numerous conferences in which professionals-psychiatrists, psychologists realize their practice and subject to discussion and debate. To this must refer to those who want to learn more about how Lacanian psychoanalysis is oriented and who do not want to repeat topics, sometimes offensive, they do not reflect anything other than a profound ignorance.

Neus Carbonell
Psychoanalyst Psychologist - Early Childhood Intervention

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

I Need Sweetness In My Chili

Myths about autism society of Morticoles done *

In his book Les Morticoles , Léon Daudet-man controversial but fearsome polemicist, describes a country that is either doctor or patient. "The police care, the mayor also, also the university, all public authorities, the government ..." 1 Apart from them, all are sick. Those who refuse are simulators that must be addressed severely because they are a danger to the public. In these people sick, the less severe can move and work, others are scattered in accommodation suitable to their condition. All are regularly evaluated.

Practitioners of mental alienation occupy an intermediate position between the other doctors and the powers of both police and justice, a pair of lines can decide their own destiny. They are the custodians of the dogma of moral responsibility which secrets are the only ones known.

In the hierarchical society of Morticoles, where hypocrisy is the rule, all obtained by intrigue. But the crucial point is that every subject should be amenable to medical power and in this science is used to serve the state.

In the hierarchy were those who had passed, sometimes brilliantly, examinations, but mostly had to rely on those who had made a particular place, near the powerful, having passed tests bearing the curious name of licking feet. To overcome the successive steps by repeating small licking feet, the qualities required were "a great flexibility of the spine and a strong dose of contempt of itself" 2 could not recover in any case-esteem very experienced but discreet pleasures in secret by small powers exercised over others, sometimes even on the bosses who allowed regular assessments control.

Thus, the assessment stands in the hierarchy, to establish it falls on its own petard. It's funny when the will to control the other makes it a whole society that is evaluated. The machine is running, inexorable, and everywhere the rights of the assessment and science take precedence over the subject.

This society of the late nineteenth century has nothing in common with ours. No doubt that the XXI century reviewers are not the best of our universities. As they say, would even the failures, but learn quickly, holding I hate hidden in a small but tenacious. Are presented without doctrine, open. First, they want to enter the place with no small feet licked, but hiding the nails. The modesty suit him very well to the evaluator. Not presented as a conqueror but rather with a slight curvature of the spine and declares with the utmost sincerity, to learn all the features evaluated. And if we do not understand when exactly the ultimate meaning of "I expect you to learn everything", the trap closes on you, regarding him incompetent in his field, he thinks simply fix with a little education and availability of well-intentioned. The evaluator is sensitive and, indeed, claims not to know While his specialty, and then required to establish together the methodology. And you're stuck, as has been hinted in your system you have become the actor in his own assessment that makes that other states do not know anything and that, however, will not be upset to issue an opinion on you.

what the doctor would evoke the Morticoles today? In anything! Well, maybe at this point that Lacan in his Seminar stigmatized Transfer: the doctor who is part of being a competition specialist is deemed qualified to talk about all "of love, politics, what is right, what's wrong ... " 3 Let us add-to give more of the operation - of sexuality, family, life, races, etc. Maybe it is increasingly less interest for the patient and increasingly for power.

The modern psychiatrist, who has given up the transfer to change the religion of science, is the associate medical excellence of power. The assessment is for him a bargain because it can justify his defection on behalf of the public good. Clinic has changed the relationship by a clinical evaluation. He is an ideologue, as the Morticoles, bearer of moral responsibility to think about having to embody. Cree in the medical order and zeal to contribute to building a society of control is unlimited. With the power, he courted and encouraged, and does not hide its objectives and discipline reshape society with the least cost.

the ordering begins at birth, tomorrow, maybe even before, for hyperactive from the uterus. Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDD) reabsorbed autism, organicity is contaminated. Should be evaluated as soon as possible the results of the newborn, diagnose and treat. Parents adhere to the medicalization of early child living as a triumph of psychoanalysis, always associated with the speeches of his guilt. This segregation medicine by establishing the first distribution to children, can not be masked by a fierce will to reintegrate them into the common school system. They are discriminated against for, then say they have the same rights as others.

If they have escaped the TGD are trapped by the dual school and medical evaluation and diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder, Hyperactivity. If it moves, is hyperactive, if not moving is the set of hyperactivity! Then they are hyperactive, and if that added some disarray with their young peers, a tendency to reject social animals and deployment in the neighborhoods in the prevailing immigration and are from the kindergarten identified as potential criminals. Of hyperactive become "troubled" or "hostile." Prevention is imposed. Physicians involved with great interest and kiddy coke 4 for all, the pharmaceutical industry invites!

The lives of these children continues and any extravagance is a deviation from the conduct, any desire for solitude the mark of a profound disturbance of mood, lack of interest in learning a cognitive defect. Vitamins, sedatives, antidepressants, antipsychotics modulated dose, if any, accompanying those lives already prepared in the scale of drug prescribed, and illegal for teenage rebellion.

There are teenagers with their crisis, their doubts, their oppositions, their suicidal thoughts, their bad games, and also with adult intolerance, the inability of parents, as well as that of the PSI, to support them in that crossing. Then Risperdal ® for everyone!

The adult has to work, then antidepressants are thought to him stimulants to increase their profitability, sedatives, if unemployed, to calm their claims.

With elderly Alzheimer's disease-causing declared in France nationally in 2007 - opens broad prospects for the inclusion of a target population that will be most amenable to evaluation, experimentation and one of the most secure sources of revenue for laboratories.

Cognitivism, neurobiology, nanotechnology, functional psychosurgery, medicine gradually unfolds its protocols on different age with applause and support of power.

Here methodical organization, evaluation of the citizen by the doctor kills the social bond and push a controlled mass medicine industry.

Society of reinstalling and win Morticoles where psychoanalysis shies. But where it resists, that assessment is not essential.

Brioles
Psychoanalyst Guy, professor of psychiatry

Translation: Julia Gutierrez and Carmen Cuñat


* Intervention Psy Forum, "Assessing kills", Paris, La Mutualité, 7 February 2010.
1. L. Daudet, Les Morticoles, Paris, Grasset, Les Cahiers Rouges, 1956, p. 19 (Morticole: neologism which can be interpreted as those who indulge in a culture of death)
2. Idem, p. 188
3. Lacan J. The Seminar, Book VIII, the transfer. Buenos Aires, Polity Press, 2003.
4. Kiddy Coke: Ritalin ® slang

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Dolce En Gabbana Shoes Real Or Fake

Knowledge and autism clinic

"Dialogue with autism" is a paradoxical and provocative title for the autistic is precisely the subject that refuses all social links, to every utterance, prefer silence, endless litany of a list of phrases, numbers or words, the endlessly repeated in the same burst of speech. [...]

The autistic is a being of language, as such, is part of the human community. No endless questioning about the fact that language, the word does not serve to communication, but to take action the fact that he is being subjected to language, say rather the signifier, and is based on their unique relationship to the signifier and the body as a dialogue can be established, allowing consent to their membership the human community. [...]

from This is what the subject presents no reducing behaviors, but considering it as a text, ie, restoring the enigma that can pierce a first interval between the subject and body, between what what you stand for and enjoy their being. It's taking ceremony of the fact that what the subject brings to meeting, his body, his gestures, noises, cries, Throwing words, retaining, is a text that offers reading. [...] Is this the beginning of reading that can establish the repetition, the fact of return, to rebuild with what the analyst feel just removed in the gesture of the subject. Then comes the surprise of consent or not subject to the range, the difference that the analyst has just introduced. The returns, in effect, which has just been repeated, but giving it a difference, setting himself an interval which has just emerged as text. Then establishing a dialogue fool who does not rest on any knowledge, but that witnesses to the other of a presence that brings the on-site in which the inanimate seemed to have settled permanently.

Jean-Pierre Rouillon

extracts Knowledge and autism. Nonette, Brochure d'accueil.

Monday, March 22, 2010

What Type Of Engineer Invent New Car Parts

For the incomparable

The impressive amount of work on the monitoring of children classified as "autistic" is a reflection of the complexity of the problem, trapped in the theoretical debates about the etiology, central budgetary matters relating to policies health, educational requirements and white argument multiple demands of families, these children have become in capacitors capitalist imperative: counting, sorting and produce an understanding emerged as valid for all. In this context, the truth, reduced to the size of the consensus, it remains indifferent to the production of tools that force the child to parody of the other, yielding about his particular way of linking to life. Thus, behavioral therapies offer a hook for hanging, as a decoy, a semblance of existence, it appears there as "adapted", ie in accordance with ghosts underlying power devices. Stripped of its uniqueness and denied the legitimacy of their mode of perception the world, the autistic child then naturally becomes an object of mental health and a public health problem. His suffering supersedes the first and encourages the second being a "disability." Surge and a realm of good intentions, where attempts to repair the "developmental disorders" conceal badly underdeveloped function (necessary to capitalist progress) the child says. The alliance between the passion to heal and certainty of common good are its reason for being there. The surplus value of this partnership, which is obtained in terms of adaptation, integration or inclusion, frequently results in a reduction of the feeling of life. "affected" by autism, classified according to the specificity of their "disorder", the child falls into a category where the name is delete behind the numbers: curious operation that transforms its ineffable discretion in single-blind ...

consenting to another logic, psychoanalysts are kids who do not speak, who make strange poses, they eat only one type of food, do not learn or "know" without learning ... Thanks to the teaching of Dr Lacan, the analysts not only have "something to say" but to help them build a face capable of providing access to the world as it is: while it is already there and ordered the other, the child should do to stay in his birth. ; There will need adaptation, integration or inclusion: the child's place is assured, their presence is proof, the analyst testifies. This is verified, in act, that psychoanalysis what a man says, but welcomed each time, an incomparable and unique version. Thus the lesson of the case requires analysts to demonstrate that the issue of autism is, above all, to ethical.
In this perspective, the group epitome of the New Red Cereda organized in 2008, a series of evenings titled "You Want to be inserted? Clinic autism everyday." We were surprised by the presence of professional horizons diverse, trained in other therapies. The signifiers of the Freudian Field then invited to a new social bond, bearer of hope, a commitment to do otherwise. Our efforts aimed at the demonstration, both the clinical as in theory. For we invite colleagues working on various aspects of autism, these colleagues generously shared their experience, without compromise on the conceptual rigor or conceal the scope of their practice. Their testimony, fortified by daily questions about the many risks of their interventions, hinted only consent to the possible identity of the speaking beings makes men free to found a fraternity worthy of the name. In these conditions, which must ensure, psychoanalysis will always have something to say.

Delia

Steinmann

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Why Is Isabella's But So Fat

dialogue with the autistic child

Because it is the same autism trying out for the path of dialogue to train children in repetitive periods of communication and speech therapy, psychoanalysis argues that:

dialogue seen from the perspective of psychoanalysis, no is defined by the value of communication, but rather on the side of what is at stake each in the match and in the word. There is dialogue when it causes a change in the relationship with the world, in relationship to the truth in relation to knowledge, in relation to the body of each of the protagonists of this dialogue.

Jean Pierre Rouillon, director of the Centre de Recherche et Thérapeutique of Nonette, Clermont Ferrand, France.
paragraph from the text in preparation for the Days of RI3, "Le dialogue avec l'autiste" in January 2008.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Long Distance Beach Buggy

Towards a knowledge of the soul

But the immediate, that comes from our spontaneity is something that we are entirely responsible, because it flows from all full of ourselves, is a reaction always urgent, urgent. We speak because something is pressing, and the pressure comes from outside of a trap intended to catch us the circumstances and the word frees us from it. By the word nos hacemos libres, libres del  momento, de la circunstancia asediante e instantánea. Pero la palabra no nos  recoge ni, por tanto, nos crea y, por el contrario, el mucho uso de ella produce  siempre una disgregación; vencemos por la palabra al momento y luego somos  vencidos por él, por la sucesión de ellos que van llevándose nuestro ataque sin  dejarnos responder. Es una continua victoria que, al fin, se transmuta en derrota. Y de esa derrota, derrota íntima, no de un hombre, sino del ser humano, nace la exigencia de escribir.  

Maria Zambrano Esencia y Hermosura . Selection of José Miguel Ullán. Ed Gutenberg Galaxy 2010. P. 307.


Thursday, March 4, 2010

Desmume Working Pokemon Gold

The paradoxes of the scientific evidence

How then to explain the success of these techniques, based on "scientific evidence"? It is certainly a combination of factors that show how the (mis) use that have made the paradigm of modern scientific medicine keeps them covered with any critique of quackery and pseudoscience, when actually it is an exercise of power, clad in scientism in the different areas: academic, professional and institutional. The faithful and Orthodox psi, followers of the EBM, do not just to promote a set of techniques and methodology but rather seek to "usurp the status of paradigm capable of solving all the old arguments of psychiatry", a task for which they find strong alliances in the pharmaceutical industry, technocracy and CBT (cognitive-behavioral).

The recall involves subjective evolution of scientific medicine finds its logic in action on the human body but is ineffective when it comes to the subject, such as speaker, and its scope. In this transfer that the TCC practitioners from one area to another, find their "success" at a price of "doing the economy of the subject, "allowing them to apply the universal possibility of healing, ignored the opacity of the symptom and intentionality.

Today we see how most of psychiatry, much of psychology and neuroscience course, aspire to be defined as behavioral sciences, excluding its object the subject himself. This operation requires an absolute encryption procedures, diagnostic tests, therapeutic effects, the results of programs. Encryption that we consider necessary and appropriate in some medical practices, in everything related to the therapy, since they constitute its very essence, but it is false and ridiculous when it comes to making accurate measurement of that part of the subject which is not, nor can be, cifrable, although it is not ineffable.

is a duty, therefore, psychoanalysis and its practitioners do not leave the management of this real cause of suffering and blind spot in the neurosciences, in the hands of quacks, whether debtors of traditional religion or that version naive seeks a return to animality (Laurent) or artificial machine. We know that the enjoyment is not eradicated, it is not to remove, adjust or adapt this disruptive behavior, is characteristic of the speaker, but rather to note the singular form of enjoyment to each in-this-and as noted sinthome Miller, trying to seal a new alliance with it, allowing a new use, more useful for the subject. José Ramón

Ubieto - Psychoanalyst
Article Excerpt The paradoxes of the "scientific evidence": evidence that are not so obvious (www.foroautismo.com)

How Tokill Your Selfwithrestoril

The day after the meeting

1-A level question.

think
particular collaboration for the Forum which includes the Autism debate goes, for me, by the question: What a great meeting about Autism? beyond the obvious. In order to skirt this issue I support it, from my analysis, in my experience of years in the public institution: first social, clinic later. Today we are faced with "what muted assessment" and we are hard to prove, with the logic of practice of the case and to show our words and our experience we know something about it that wants to silence. Why a Forum? "For we must explain the risks of limited assessment of the figure, which silences the particularity of every human being" (Presentation of the Forum on-line Autism). A Forum on Autism, in my opinion, a toggle function to promote reflection and discussion with all those who feel concerned and touched by the thrust of the ideology of the evaluation. It invades the broad field of subjectivity, so I understand that the meeting through the work of psychoanalysts who hold professional and personal services with the various population groups, have a disorder or another, a structure or another. It is essential that there is a desire in the game and subjective distress against which a response. And why now becomes more relevant?. Maybe we have not managed to make our public airwaves particular job?. Then what impact has this had our say in each of the conferences, research groups, stages, discussion and clinical practice., organized by psychoanalysts in the Freudian field where network professionals attending educational, social, medical?. What happens later in the day job, when the truth is, the exercise of the function of each? It is true that today's society, crossed by an excess of legislation enacts a particularly stark a push to erase, if not destroy, the subjectivity in the field of human relations. But in my experience, this scenario is not so different that we have been finding some of us from the final decade of the twentieth century. Where then is the difference? We see the current requests and referrals that come from various professionals and families when their children are involved, and there is growing alarm among us. I wonder why? in an attempt to put aside the obvious, which is just as difficult. When the alarm looming we run the risk of not taking the best guidance, and our responses can not live up to the occasion. If each of us, and we are many, "analysts at our institutions and inquiries, respond to a function about a wish, it is not likely to go through the protocol, then why not have more confidence in our capabilities and in reach of the power of our speech and our intervention?. In this sense, I think the good weapon is to contribute to good arguments and good epistemic elements extracted from our training, which arises at the intersection of theory study and our particular experience. I should then be able to say that everyone learns, and what everyone knows in relation to their practice. In my case, I learn to be fought its excesses and perversions with daily work. It seems a truism, but it is not.

2 - A level of response comes
Today institutions, but also to private consultations, through the discourse of contemporary Another frenzied wave of standards, suggestive and manipulative techniques, requests in the form of mandates ... in relation to cases of individuals living in fragile mental and therefore, social life. Proclaim the arrival of an unstoppable tsunami, which did not appeal to me stating is because, in my opinion, creates more anxiety than production. Of course, if the legislation moves to the detriment of the subject is very worrisome, but we know that our response is the (good)-take-us of the issue that arises. Therefore, there is always something to say. Always there is anything we can do. In Spain, for example, "Autism has become an urgent case, but if the parameter is to abide by the policy proposals and requests from some of the associations of families of" sick "The list is extensive. Tell the other parties accused by the other reviewer of "hyperactive, OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder), disorders (disorder) of the conduct, the display dependent on consumption, the abused, the dyslexic ...." We do them all one by one, work. With family, teachers, doctors, and services that care as well. Many hours many days of work, in which we transmit our particular way of reading the suffering of the subject and particularized and guide treatment. If we made a calculation, would calibrate the number of people who take home their profits, their most and least product of the encounter with psychoanalysis through a psychoanalyst. This also gives us the pulse of our limits, which also transmit to the other. My point is that this is a way to stop the madness combat this trend evaluating and controlling prevailing market relations. I think it is necessary to produce meetings to address our practice and our particular response mode to the problem of time: "To argue and think about the risk we all if we lose sight of the subjective dimension, that dimension which involves the real is not limited by science" (Ibid). But not enough. The crucial thing is the day after when it's time to apply what we learned in our experience unique. Therefore, I do from here praising the detail work, fine, warned that every psychoanalyst hold in the day to day with individuals who come to our place to check. This is one of the privileged framework where we display a low analytical transfer intervention and where we go, minute minute, our belief in psychoanalysis and social utility. Therefore, how we respond to the current situation according to the analytical discourse ethics? A particular contribution is to go for our savoir faire et, the number of each product analysis, control work and his analytic training. Nothing more, nothing less: "Provided that the analyst is warned that his act, the analytic act is guided by the real to sift in each case, from the devices (in the) involved" (Presentation of "The PRS debate, November 28, 2008, Lucia D'Angelo). This is the way that I think can lead us to achieving a good job wherever we are in the fabric of the network. If the other wants to give consistency to your liking to overturn the subjectivity of the student, the sick patient, the user, the son ... We believe we must orient our knowledge pragmatic. We must persist in focusing our work to the field of intervention with parlêtre: A man who suffers from a body that speaks, silencing, which hallucinate, raving ... This is our ethical responsibility. Accordingly, the Forum on "what muted assessment" should be a good platform for reflect and discuss together what lies ahead in daily practice and how we respond to it.

Rosa Godinez-Psiconalista

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Price Choppers Uniform

About Autism Autism

are already numerous subjects in the course of their lives have been evaluated and diagnosed under the label "autistic" and give their testimony today. Testimonials show more interest than some assessments infatuated by scientific evidence. It is important not to dismiss the teachings of their testimony, these experts in autism. A great example is Kamran Nazeer brings in his book "André puppets. Five autistic in the world "(1) fruitful one more evidence that allows us to approach the subjects left behind as this label suggests.

is the paradox of what he calls "the talk" as it is attributed to individuals with autism do not talk. As evidenced by what are called stereotypes, rituals, behaviors are inconsistent bet glimpses of these subjects to develop and restore a possible link with the other, turning the words of the psychoanalytically oriented clinical use of the object, the image, the dignity of the signifier. It does noting how he and his companions had a special tie to the other, which by their nature not obvious went unnoticed, but lets see this post as special appeal for each of them, their methods, what he calls "local coherence" ways as they draw a bond with others, with his body and the world around . As stated in one of the key passages from his book, "much of the life-encouraging conversation, thought, creativity, friendship, politics, is based on understanding the world of others, but in the case of autism, they may have a single reference autos, his own. "

an exemplary way with the phrase says, repeating his friend Craig "entering the idiots" and even the non-autistic There is no other, is not entirely indifferent to language. This phrase allowed orientation in relation to the other, for domestic courts, leading some nonsense where the listeners, but he acted as a reference to a circuit, a series in which he made an attempt to location. Of what it represented to him and assumed meant for others. In the words of Nazeer "autistics often difficult to establish routines for simple tasks." This makes it not obvious, why not say and there is something that can be told. As indicated in the clinical guidance that underlines Lacan in his lecture on the symptom (3). Nazeer stops at those sayings, behaviors, ways he calls "behavior for consistency", "local coherence", for which more than indicators of the deficit, given the status of creative production, solution for each of their peers.

can say that they are subject put to work to locate the elusive a malaise from which to paraphrase the title of the testimony of Birger Sellin, "prisoner of himself," prisoners were living under the threat of intrusion, the very strangeness of As provided by their body and what it emits, put in resonance with others. Teaches us in writing the particular and the general trend of the effects on human beings llanguage speakers. As André confirmed me, the problem was not the complexity of language, but the dynamism that a word could have more than one meaning or, conversely, the possibility of saying the same thing in different ways, each with a different hue . André such notes, made use of puppets, which took place when he wanted to talk, "it seemed that the puppet went into action when he failed local coherence. First he tried another way to conform, but because it did not work, is replaced by the puppet itself. Fled, instead of staying there, moved. Those were the puppets for him, a big booster of the most conventional of autism. The weight of the word on a subject is clearly visible here. No doubt the way you do with puppets relocate eyes of others and was on the look as we said was interested in her treatment through the field of artificial vision in computers and robots. Concluding the conversation with André and use it did with his puppet says, "to write - as in the case of Kamran, the Donna William (4) or Birger Sellin among others, can be just as useful, but is a resource employing few people. André did not write. So for him, as for most, the conversation is the only way out a bit of yourself. "

With his friend Randall shows the role of parallel play and question the mentality of autism pointing as this mess in the categories of significant misunderstandings and not leave without problems to the common denominator of the speakers. Were asked what particular the autistic, and the genius. Sideways and raised interest in the existence of intimate relationships in autism. In his commentary on Craig, another of his colleagues and in his place capacitor referred to juice the Scripture says: "He began exploring his father's books on writing speeches. Learned what was up threefolding. Le was like taking the office, he moved, supported it. Learned what was the antithesis. Gained confidence, decreased inhibition ... "Kamran concludes" He used the speeches written for others to express it, like André used the puppets. " Jose Castillo



(1) Kamran Nazeer. André puppets. Five autistic world. Alba Editorial, Barcelona: 2008.
(2) Birger Sellin. Prigioniero di me stesso. Viaggio in autism l'. Boringhieri Bollati, Torino: 1995.
(3) Jacques Lacan. "Conference on the symptoms," in speeches and texts 2 . Editorial Manantial, Buenos Aires, 2007.
(4) Donna Williams. If there je ne me touche plus . Ed Robert Laffont, Paris: 1992.

Star Wars Pine Wood Derby Cras

The uniqueness

The cognitive performances autism are extremely variable and can range from gifted, used socially, even bigger deficits, requiring constant dedication. In the first, the symptoms decrease or disappear, in seconds, the deficits are in the forefront of the clinical picture. Leads to nothing trying to understand autism from the sum of symptoms is not a disease, is a singular subjective performance.


Excerpt from the introduction of the book L'autiste et la voix [The autistic and voice] published by the psychiatrist and psychoanalyst Frenchman Jean-Claude Maleval (Ed. Seuil, Collection du Champ Freudien, 2009).

Monday, March 1, 2010

Where Can You Make Custom Ear Gauges

Conversations with Galileo (pseudonym of a man of science) *

Galileo
Well, now finally begin to speak from a position where we can "misunderstanding" of the good way and not simply launch boomerangs "knowledge." I appreciate your comments [about a possible science of behavior], but now we have arguments in the order of knowledge. Agree with me on the following: that a science is constituted as such, it is necessary first to define the object of an accurate, objective, which is validated independently of the observer and his instruments. The so-called scientific psychology since its inception drag a problem among many that are unable to resolve so convincing to many scientists and epistemologists, is the very formation of its scientific object. Its supposed purpose, "the observable behavior of individuals and their mental processes," is an abstraction that depends more on the point of view of an observer who does not supposed objectivity of the phenomenon. The issue is most elusive and have not yet seen someone who founded the epistemological budget with a real "scientific spirit." Watson, to talk about the one who tried, sought to define that object as a set of objectively observable adaptive reactions that an organism - usually with a nervous system - running response to stimuli - also observable - from the environment they live. Although since Watson has run a lot of ink, (introducing the notion of affect and cognition, for example), this "principle" remains valid and unchallenged as far as I know. Seen this way, can not see how psychology could serve as a science distinct from ethology, or biology, or the same computer science. I'm not saying''take its foundations "in them - a euphemism that many intend to resolve the issue - it is constituted as a science in order to lay strong sense real chair. (At this point, the reading of Georges Canguilhem, to set a critical example among many, is most instructive.) From there, the mistakes will happen. For example: how to distinguish a "response" - which nevertheless represents a significant intention - from mere "reaction" from a biological system? I'm considering things in the basic principles, but things can get worse problems as the current building chimera - that itself is a chimera, estimated Galileo - of wanting to catch the meaning of the thoughts, desires and emotions, colored images with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of brain. From this epistemological perspective, calls CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy), which deal in very different and sometimes contradictory to the neurosciences, must demonstrate that they are still more than a mixed bag of techniques and auto-induced autocoerción statistical dressing to be identifiable science.
remains to be addressed here the other major problem of measurement in this field. Hence, estimated Galileo, your illustrious predecessor Galielo Galieli raised its "measure everything that is measurable and what is not measurable make measurable" a big problem not solved so far. You know me better than the limit set by Planck's constant.
So when you say to Regarding the arguments of those therapies, "What I heard was a language comparable terminology and procedures, in many respects with the so-called scientific method, should I rather think that you let yourself be seduced by the beautiful sirens of language, by powerful formal aspect, but empty of content that have borrowed from other beings much less mythical? Dear Galileo, at this point, prefer to stick tied to the mast and sail between the Scylla and Charybdis of science and the subject that makes it possible.
From there, I will gladly debate.

Miquel Bassols - Psychoanalyst

* This brief text is part of a debate recently passed a science forum of the newspaper "Public."