The impressive amount of work on the monitoring of children classified as "autistic" is a reflection of the complexity of the problem, trapped in the theoretical debates about the etiology, central budgetary matters relating to policies health, educational requirements and white argument multiple demands of families, these children have become in capacitors capitalist imperative: counting, sorting and produce an understanding emerged as valid for all. In this context, the truth, reduced to the size of the consensus, it remains indifferent to the production of tools that force the child to parody of the other, yielding about his particular way of linking to life. Thus, behavioral therapies offer a hook for hanging, as a decoy, a semblance of existence, it appears there as "adapted", ie in accordance with ghosts underlying power devices. Stripped of its uniqueness and denied the legitimacy of their mode of perception the world, the autistic child then naturally becomes an object of mental health and a public health problem. His suffering supersedes the first and encourages the second being a "disability." Surge and a realm of good intentions, where attempts to repair the "developmental disorders" conceal badly underdeveloped function (necessary to capitalist progress) the child says. The alliance between the passion to heal and certainty of common good are its reason for being there. The surplus value of this partnership, which is obtained in terms of adaptation, integration or inclusion, frequently results in a reduction of the feeling of life. "affected" by autism, classified according to the specificity of their "disorder", the child falls into a category where the name is delete behind the numbers: curious operation that transforms its ineffable discretion in single-blind ...
consenting to another logic, psychoanalysts are kids who do not speak, who make strange poses, they eat only one type of food, do not learn or "know" without learning ... Thanks to the teaching of Dr Lacan, the analysts not only have "something to say" but to help them build a face capable of providing access to the world as it is: while it is already there and ordered the other, the child should do to stay in his birth. ; There will need adaptation, integration or inclusion: the child's place is assured, their presence is proof, the analyst testifies. This is verified, in act, that psychoanalysis what a man says, but welcomed each time, an incomparable and unique version. Thus the lesson of the case requires analysts to demonstrate that the issue of autism is, above all, to ethical.
In this perspective, the group epitome of the New Red Cereda organized in 2008, a series of evenings titled "You Want to be inserted? Clinic autism everyday." We were surprised by the presence of professional horizons diverse, trained in other therapies. The signifiers of the Freudian Field then invited to a new social bond, bearer of hope, a commitment to do otherwise. Our efforts aimed at the demonstration, both the clinical as in theory. For we invite colleagues working on various aspects of autism, these colleagues generously shared their experience, without compromise on the conceptual rigor or conceal the scope of their practice. Their testimony, fortified by daily questions about the many risks of their interventions, hinted only consent to the possible identity of the speaking beings makes men free to found a fraternity worthy of the name. In these conditions, which must ensure, psychoanalysis will always have something to say.
consenting to another logic, psychoanalysts are kids who do not speak, who make strange poses, they eat only one type of food, do not learn or "know" without learning ... Thanks to the teaching of Dr Lacan, the analysts not only have "something to say" but to help them build a face capable of providing access to the world as it is: while it is already there and ordered the other, the child should do to stay in his birth. ; There will need adaptation, integration or inclusion: the child's place is assured, their presence is proof, the analyst testifies. This is verified, in act, that psychoanalysis what a man says, but welcomed each time, an incomparable and unique version. Thus the lesson of the case requires analysts to demonstrate that the issue of autism is, above all, to ethical.
In this perspective, the group epitome of the New Red Cereda organized in 2008, a series of evenings titled "You Want to be inserted? Clinic autism everyday." We were surprised by the presence of professional horizons diverse, trained in other therapies. The signifiers of the Freudian Field then invited to a new social bond, bearer of hope, a commitment to do otherwise. Our efforts aimed at the demonstration, both the clinical as in theory. For we invite colleagues working on various aspects of autism, these colleagues generously shared their experience, without compromise on the conceptual rigor or conceal the scope of their practice. Their testimony, fortified by daily questions about the many risks of their interventions, hinted only consent to the possible identity of the speaking beings makes men free to found a fraternity worthy of the name. In these conditions, which must ensure, psychoanalysis will always have something to say.
Delia
Steinmann
0 comments:
Post a Comment