"Dialogue with autism" is a paradoxical and provocative title for the autistic is precisely the subject that refuses all social links, to every utterance, prefer silence, endless litany of a list of phrases, numbers or words, the endlessly repeated in the same burst of speech. [...]
The autistic is a being of language, as such, is part of the human community. No endless questioning about the fact that language, the word does not serve to communication, but to take action the fact that he is being subjected to language, say rather the signifier, and is based on their unique relationship to the signifier and the body as a dialogue can be established, allowing consent to their membership the human community. [...]
from This is what the subject presents no reducing behaviors, but considering it as a text, ie, restoring the enigma that can pierce a first interval between the subject and body, between what what you stand for and enjoy their being. It's taking ceremony of the fact that what the subject brings to meeting, his body, his gestures, noises, cries, Throwing words, retaining, is a text that offers reading. [...] Is this the beginning of reading that can establish the repetition, the fact of return, to rebuild with what the analyst feel just removed in the gesture of the subject. Then comes the surprise of consent or not subject to the range, the difference that the analyst has just introduced. The returns, in effect, which has just been repeated, but giving it a difference, setting himself an interval which has just emerged as text. Then establishing a dialogue fool who does not rest on any knowledge, but that witnesses to the other of a presence that brings the on-site in which the inanimate seemed to have settled permanently.
The autistic is a being of language, as such, is part of the human community. No endless questioning about the fact that language, the word does not serve to communication, but to take action the fact that he is being subjected to language, say rather the signifier, and is based on their unique relationship to the signifier and the body as a dialogue can be established, allowing consent to their membership the human community. [...]
from This is what the subject presents no reducing behaviors, but considering it as a text, ie, restoring the enigma that can pierce a first interval between the subject and body, between what what you stand for and enjoy their being. It's taking ceremony of the fact that what the subject brings to meeting, his body, his gestures, noises, cries, Throwing words, retaining, is a text that offers reading. [...] Is this the beginning of reading that can establish the repetition, the fact of return, to rebuild with what the analyst feel just removed in the gesture of the subject. Then comes the surprise of consent or not subject to the range, the difference that the analyst has just introduced. The returns, in effect, which has just been repeated, but giving it a difference, setting himself an interval which has just emerged as text. Then establishing a dialogue fool who does not rest on any knowledge, but that witnesses to the other of a presence that brings the on-site in which the inanimate seemed to have settled permanently.
Jean-Pierre Rouillon
extracts Knowledge and autism. Nonette, Brochure d'accueil.
0 comments:
Post a Comment