How then to explain the success of these techniques, based on "scientific evidence"? It is certainly a combination of factors that show how the (mis) use that have made the paradigm of modern scientific medicine keeps them covered with any critique of quackery and pseudoscience, when actually it is an exercise of power, clad in scientism in the different areas: academic, professional and institutional. The faithful and Orthodox psi, followers of the EBM, do not just to promote a set of techniques and methodology but rather seek to "usurp the status of paradigm capable of solving all the old arguments of psychiatry", a task for which they find strong alliances in the pharmaceutical industry, technocracy and CBT (cognitive-behavioral).
The recall involves subjective evolution of scientific medicine finds its logic in action on the human body but is ineffective when it comes to the subject, such as speaker, and its scope. In this transfer that the TCC practitioners from one area to another, find their "success" at a price of "doing the economy of the subject, "allowing them to apply the universal possibility of healing, ignored the opacity of the symptom and intentionality.
Today we see how most of psychiatry, much of psychology and neuroscience course, aspire to be defined as behavioral sciences, excluding its object the subject himself. This operation requires an absolute encryption procedures, diagnostic tests, therapeutic effects, the results of programs. Encryption that we consider necessary and appropriate in some medical practices, in everything related to the therapy, since they constitute its very essence, but it is false and ridiculous when it comes to making accurate measurement of that part of the subject which is not, nor can be, cifrable, although it is not ineffable.
is a duty, therefore, psychoanalysis and its practitioners do not leave the management of this real cause of suffering and blind spot in the neurosciences, in the hands of quacks, whether debtors of traditional religion or that version naive seeks a return to animality (Laurent) or artificial machine. We know that the enjoyment is not eradicated, it is not to remove, adjust or adapt this disruptive behavior, is characteristic of the speaker, but rather to note the singular form of enjoyment to each in-this-and as noted sinthome Miller, trying to seal a new alliance with it, allowing a new use, more useful for the subject. José Ramón
The recall involves subjective evolution of scientific medicine finds its logic in action on the human body but is ineffective when it comes to the subject, such as speaker, and its scope. In this transfer that the TCC practitioners from one area to another, find their "success" at a price of "doing the economy of the subject, "allowing them to apply the universal possibility of healing, ignored the opacity of the symptom and intentionality.
Today we see how most of psychiatry, much of psychology and neuroscience course, aspire to be defined as behavioral sciences, excluding its object the subject himself. This operation requires an absolute encryption procedures, diagnostic tests, therapeutic effects, the results of programs. Encryption that we consider necessary and appropriate in some medical practices, in everything related to the therapy, since they constitute its very essence, but it is false and ridiculous when it comes to making accurate measurement of that part of the subject which is not, nor can be, cifrable, although it is not ineffable.
is a duty, therefore, psychoanalysis and its practitioners do not leave the management of this real cause of suffering and blind spot in the neurosciences, in the hands of quacks, whether debtors of traditional religion or that version naive seeks a return to animality (Laurent) or artificial machine. We know that the enjoyment is not eradicated, it is not to remove, adjust or adapt this disruptive behavior, is characteristic of the speaker, but rather to note the singular form of enjoyment to each in-this-and as noted sinthome Miller, trying to seal a new alliance with it, allowing a new use, more useful for the subject. José Ramón
Ubieto - Psychoanalyst
Article Excerpt The paradoxes of the "scientific evidence": evidence that are not so obvious (www.foroautismo.com)
0 comments:
Post a Comment