1-A level question.
think
particular collaboration for the Forum which includes the Autism debate goes, for me, by the question: What a great meeting about Autism? beyond the obvious. In order to skirt this issue I support it, from my analysis, in my experience of years in the public institution: first social, clinic later. Today we are faced with "what muted assessment" and we are hard to prove, with the logic of practice of the case and to show our words and our experience we know something about it that wants to silence. Why a Forum? "For we must explain the risks of limited assessment of the figure, which silences the particularity of every human being" (Presentation of the Forum on-line Autism). A Forum on Autism, in my opinion, a toggle function to promote reflection and discussion with all those who feel concerned and touched by the thrust of the ideology of the evaluation. It invades the broad field of subjectivity, so I understand that the meeting through the work of psychoanalysts who hold professional and personal services with the various population groups, have a disorder or another, a structure or another. It is essential that there is a desire in the game and subjective distress against which a response. And why now becomes more relevant?. Maybe we have not managed to make our public airwaves particular job?. Then what impact has this had our say in each of the conferences, research groups, stages, discussion and clinical practice., organized by psychoanalysts in the Freudian field where network professionals attending educational, social, medical?. What happens later in the day job, when the truth is, the exercise of the function of each? It is true that today's society, crossed by an excess of legislation enacts a particularly stark a push to erase, if not destroy, the subjectivity in the field of human relations. But in my experience, this scenario is not so different that we have been finding some of us from the final decade of the twentieth century. Where then is the difference? We see the current requests and referrals that come from various professionals and families when their children are involved, and there is growing alarm among us. I wonder why? in an attempt to put aside the obvious, which is just as difficult. When the alarm looming we run the risk of not taking the best guidance, and our responses can not live up to the occasion. If each of us, and we are many, "analysts at our institutions and inquiries, respond to a function about a wish, it is not likely to go through the protocol, then why not have more confidence in our capabilities and in reach of the power of our speech and our intervention?. In this sense, I think the good weapon is to contribute to good arguments and good epistemic elements extracted from our training, which arises at the intersection of theory study and our particular experience. I should then be able to say that everyone learns, and what everyone knows in relation to their practice. In my case, I learn to be fought its excesses and perversions with daily work. It seems a truism, but it is not.
2 - A level of response comes
Today institutions, but also to private consultations, through the discourse of contemporary Another frenzied wave of standards, suggestive and manipulative techniques, requests in the form of mandates ... in relation to cases of individuals living in fragile mental and therefore, social life. Proclaim the arrival of an unstoppable tsunami, which did not appeal to me stating is because, in my opinion, creates more anxiety than production. Of course, if the legislation moves to the detriment of the subject is very worrisome, but we know that our response is the (good)-take-us of the issue that arises. Therefore, there is always something to say. Always there is anything we can do. In Spain, for example, "Autism has become an urgent case, but if the parameter is to abide by the policy proposals and requests from some of the associations of families of" sick "The list is extensive. Tell the other parties accused by the other reviewer of "hyperactive, OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder), disorders (disorder) of the conduct, the display dependent on consumption, the abused, the dyslexic ...." We do them all one by one, work. With family, teachers, doctors, and services that care as well. Many hours many days of work, in which we transmit our particular way of reading the suffering of the subject and particularized and guide treatment. If we made a calculation, would calibrate the number of people who take home their profits, their most and least product of the encounter with psychoanalysis through a psychoanalyst. This also gives us the pulse of our limits, which also transmit to the other. My point is that this is a way to stop the madness combat this trend evaluating and controlling prevailing market relations. I think it is necessary to produce meetings to address our practice and our particular response mode to the problem of time: "To argue and think about the risk we all if we lose sight of the subjective dimension, that dimension which involves the real is not limited by science" (Ibid). But not enough. The crucial thing is the day after when it's time to apply what we learned in our experience unique. Therefore, I do from here praising the detail work, fine, warned that every psychoanalyst hold in the day to day with individuals who come to our place to check. This is one of the privileged framework where we display a low analytical transfer intervention and where we go, minute minute, our belief in psychoanalysis and social utility. Therefore, how we respond to the current situation according to the analytical discourse ethics? A particular contribution is to go for our savoir faire et, the number of each product analysis, control work and his analytic training. Nothing more, nothing less: "Provided that the analyst is warned that his act, the analytic act is guided by the real to sift in each case, from the devices (in the) involved" (Presentation of "The PRS debate, November 28, 2008, Lucia D'Angelo). This is the way that I think can lead us to achieving a good job wherever we are in the fabric of the network. If the other wants to give consistency to your liking to overturn the subjectivity of the student, the sick patient, the user, the son ... We believe we must orient our knowledge pragmatic. We must persist in focusing our work to the field of intervention with parlêtre: A man who suffers from a body that speaks, silencing, which hallucinate, raving ... This is our ethical responsibility. Accordingly, the Forum on "what muted assessment" should be a good platform for reflect and discuss together what lies ahead in daily practice and how we respond to it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment